Concurrent validity of Myotest for assessing explosive strength indicators in countermovement jump

8Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Previous research has determined the validity and reliability of accelerometer-based devices, but the findings are not consistent. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of an accelerometer (Myotest PRO) for measuring explosive strength indicators (jump height, peak force, peak velocity, and peak power) during the countermovement jump. Methods: Thirty-three university students (22 males and 11 females; 178.6 ± 5.6 cm, 69.3 ± 6.5 kg, 21.8 ± 1.7 years) performed five individual countermovement jumps. Jump height was derived from an accelerometer (Myotest, frequency 200 Hz), optic timing system (Optojump) and from a force plate (Kistler, frequency 800 Hz) using both flight time and force impulse algorithms. Peak force, peak velocity, and peak power were calculated by the accelerometer and force plate. Results: The Myotest resulted in systematic bias, overestimating jump height by 8.0 ± 2.1 cm (p < .001) compared to force impulse algorithm; flight time algorithm by 5.5 ± 2.0 cm (p < .001) using the force plate and by 5.9 ± 2.0 cm (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hojka, V., Tufano, J. J., Malý, T., Šťastný, P., Jebavý, R., Feher, J., … Gryc, T. (2018). Concurrent validity of Myotest for assessing explosive strength indicators in countermovement jump. Acta Gymnica, 48(3), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2018.013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free