Skip to content

The reality of environmental cooperation and the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This artice is free to access.

Abstract

Using insights from classical functionalism, this article analyses the complex relationship between the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea and the Caspian Environment Programme (CEP). The article pursues three objectives. First, it shows how shared ecological issues challenged individual littoral states and brought their respective governments under the CEP umbrella in 1998. Second, it shows how key actors (UNEP, UNDP, GEF, and World Bank–besides states) are involved in shaping the politics of the Caspian Sea region and how their preferences, both political and economic, and networks affect the capacity, opportunity and will of governments (e.g., ministries, parliaments and presidents) to cooperate. Third, it explains the link between low environmental politics and the uncertain legal status of the Caspian Sea. I find that lessons learned from environmental cooperation spilled over into the discussion of the legal status of the sea, which culminated in the signing of the Convention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bayramov, A. (2020). The reality of environmental cooperation and the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea. Central Asian Survey, 39(4), 500–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2020.1815653

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free