Unmet need for medical care and safety net accessibility among Birmingham's homeless

34Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although homeless individuals often experience health problems requiring care, there are limitations to available research concerning the scale of their needs and the accessibility of safety net agencies to meet them. Traditional access-to-care surveys calculate unmet need among all persons queried (rather than persons needing care), making it difficult to calculate what percentage of persons requiring care actually obtain it. Additionally, no research has compared the relative accessibility of safety net programs to homeless persons in need. This cross-sectional, community-based survey assessed the prevalence of unmet need for several specific types of health care and compared the accessibility of agencies in Birmingham, AL. Substantial proportions of respondents reported unmet needs for general medical care (46 %), specialty care (51 %), mental health care (51 %), dental care (62 %), medications (57 %), and care of a child (23 %). The most commonly mentioned sites where care was sought included a federally funded Health Care for the Homeless (HCH) program (59 %), a religious free clinic (31 %), and a public hospital emergency department (51 %). The HCH program was most commonly cited as the location where care, once sought, could not be obtained (15 %), followed by the county hospital primary care clinics (13 %). In this survey, unmet need was common for all types of care queried, including primary care. Key components of the safety net, including a federally funded homeless health care program, had suboptimum accessibility. © 2013 The New York Academy of Medicine (outside the USA).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kertesz, S. G., McNeil, W., Cash, J. J., Desmond, R., McGwin, G., Kelly, J., & Baggett, T. P. (2014). Unmet need for medical care and safety net accessibility among Birmingham’s homeless. Journal of Urban Health, 91(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9801-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free