Embryotoxic effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine during the peri-implantation period in the rat

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Experiment 1: Administration of 5-hydroxytryptamine creatinine sulphate (5-HT) 5-10-20 mg/kg s.c. to pregnant rats during the preimplantation period (1200 h, Days 1 through 5) did not inhibit implantation. Experiment 2: Administration to pregnant rats during the peri-implantation period (0900 h. Day 6) of 5-HT 5 mg/kg s.c. did not affect implantation or embryofetal development. 5-HT 10 mg/kg s.c. produced a significant increase (P > 0.01) in the resorption rate (31.8%) and severe cardiovascular or ophthalmic malformations in 5.3% of viable fetuses. 5-HT 20 mg/kg produced a resorption rate (97.2%) virtually incompatible with the continuance of pregnancy. Experiment 3: Histological examination of uterine preparations made from Day 6 pregnant rats sacrificed 6, 24, and 30 h after receiving 5-HT 20 mg/kg s.c. showed, in 30 h post-injection preparations, toxic effects at implantation sites (uterine lumen completely deprived of epithelial layer and filled with cellular debris, and complete degeneration of implanted embryos) but no toxic effects between implantation sites. Experiment 4: Administration of 5-HT 10 mg/kg s.c. to pregnant rats during the postimplantation period (Days 10 and 11) produced a 63.2% resorption rate, a reduction in the mean weight of viable fetuses, and severe malformations in 24% of viable fetuses. The embryotoxic activity of 5-HT may be attributed to its vasoconstrictive action which renders the uterine mucosa or trophoblast ischemic, thus causing irreversible damage to the luminal epithelium at the implantation sites.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aliverti, V., Bonanomi, L., Giavini, E., Leone, V. G., Mariani, L., Prati, M., & Vismara, C. (1982). Embryotoxic effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine during the peri-implantation period in the rat. Biology of Reproduction, 27(5), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod27.5.1231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free