Sharing and Diversity in Emotion terminology

  • Wallace A
  • Carson M
49Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Examined semantic inconsistencies in terminology used to describe emotions, particularly in attempts to assign emotional labels in physiological studies. A wide variation was found in the emotional terms 10 adult Ss' chose to describe a large number of sample stories. Each S used a core vocabulary of 26-27 words describing emotions and a total vocabulary of emotional terms of 27-29 words. Ss also exhibited a basic method of taxonomic categorization of their responses that was based on the dimensions of violence and intensity. A combination of individual and (more importantly) terminological diversity is postulated as the cause of these differences. Implications for psychological research are discussed. (32 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallace, AnthonyF. C., & Carson, MargaretT. (1973). Sharing and Diversity in Emotion terminology. Ethos, 1(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1973.1.1.02a00020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free