In this study a technical-economic comparison was conducted to compare three different agronomic practices applied to paddy rice cultivation areas in Italy: one based on conventional tillage (CT), and two adopting conservative agriculture approaches, namely minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT). Data about production inputs (seed, fertilizers, agrochemicals, fuel) and working time were measured for each technique during the whole production season in three experimental fields. The total production costs were computed by adding the mechanization costs, calculated through the ASABE (American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers) EP (Engineering Practice) 496.3 methodology, and the production input costs. The results of the study highlighted a significant reduction of total costs obtained with both minimum (−16%) and no-tillage (−19%) compared to conventional tillage.
CITATION STYLE
Calcante, A., & Oberti, R. (2019). A technical-economic comparison between conventional tillage and conservative techniques in paddy-rice production practice in northern Italy. Agronomy, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120886
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.