Effect of a mobile phone-based glucose-monitoring and feedback system for type 2 diabetes management in multiple primary care clinic settings: Cluster randomized controlled trial

65Citations
Citations of this article
304Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Recent evidence of the effectiveness of mobile phone-based diabetes management systems is generally based on studies conducted in tertiary hospitals or professional diabetes clinics. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and applicability of a mobile phone-based glucose-monitoring and feedback system for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in multiple primary care clinic settings. Methods: In this multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled, open trial, 13 primary care clinics in Seoul and other large cities in South Korea were voluntarily recruited. Overall, 150 (9 clinics) and 97 (4 clinics) participants with T2DM were assigned to the intervention and control groups, respectively (2:1 allocation). Every month, participants in both groups attended face-to-face physicians' consultation for the management of diabetes in the clinic. For the intervention group, participants were required to upload their daily self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) results using the mobile phone app in addition to outpatient care for 3 months. The results were automatically transmitted to the main server. Physicians had to check their patients' SMBG results through an administrator's website and send a short feedback message at least once a week. At baseline and 3 months, both groups had anthropometry and blood tests, including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and responded to questionnaires about treatment satisfaction and compliance. Results: At 3 months, participants in the intervention group showed significantly more improvement in HbA1c (adjusted mean difference to control -0.30%, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.11; P=.003) and fasting plasma glucose (-17.29 mg/dL, 95% CI -29.33 to -5.26; P=.005) than those in the control group. In addition, there was significantly more reduction in blood pressure, and the score regarding treatment satisfaction and motivation for medication adherence increased more in the intervention group than in the control group. In the subgroup analyses, the effect on glycemic control was more significant among younger patients and higher baseline HbA1c levels. Conclusions: The mobile phone-based glucose-monitoring and feedback system was effective in glycemic control when applied in primary care clinic settings. This system could be utilized effectively with diverse institutions and patients.

References Powered by Scopus

Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes

4043Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: A pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants

2942Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting

2343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023

314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022

0
204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diabetes technology: Standards of medical care in diabetes−2021

0
172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, Y., Lee, E. Y., Kim, H. S., Lee, S. H., Yoon, K. H., & Cho, J. H. (2020). Effect of a mobile phone-based glucose-monitoring and feedback system for type 2 diabetes management in multiple primary care clinic settings: Cluster randomized controlled trial. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/16266

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2503570105140

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 53

65%

Researcher 12

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 39

45%

Nursing and Health Professions 36

42%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 6

7%

Social Sciences 5

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0