Conclusions

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With the war over, it was time for a celebration. In 1922, the Irish Free State began to plan a major spectacle, the Tailteann Games, billed as ‘The Irish Race Olympic’. It did not bode well, though, that the planned 1922 Games had to be cancelled due to threats of Republican violence.2 Rescheduled to 1924, the Games were held every four years until 1932, when they ran afoul of government parsimony and Fianna Fáil hostility towards a Treatyite event.3 While the Northern Whig, a solidly unionist newspaper, may have dismissed the 1924 Games as being nothing but ‘An Anti-British Meeting’,4 in actuality they were an expression of the prevailing ideology of the new Free State, an ideology that stretched back at least to the 1880s. Indeed, most of the themes that this book has sought to understand were present in these events. As well as signifying the power of the new state, the Games expressed a redeemed ancient Irish past, the reviving of a supposedly ancient, but in reality invented, festival said to have been inaugurated in 632 bcby the eponymous Tailte, ‘a wise and much loved’ Queen.5 The Games’ chief organiser, J.J. Walsh, echoed a common claim that the Tailteann Games had survived throughout antiquity, only to be ended by the Anglo-Norman invasion.6 The ‘revival’ of these Games thus marked a return to a time when the nation was not under English control. This athletic form of time travel was suitable for ‘the new historical days in Ireland’7 after 1922.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beatty, A. (2016). Conclusions. In Genders and Sexualities in History (pp. 225–233). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44101-0_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free