Inhibition of neurofibromin and p120 GTPase activating protein (GAP) by dietary fatty acids

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Neurofibromin and p120 GTPase activating protein (p120 GAP) down-regulate the activity of cellular Ras proteins. How the activity of these two proteins is controlled is not yet clear. In this study, we analyzed the effects of eight nutritionally relevant fatty acids on GTPase stimulatory activity of full-length neurofibromin and p120 GAP. The fatty acids tested were: saturated stearic acid, monounsaturated oleic acid, three ω-6 and three ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. The analysis was performed by Ras immunoprecipitation GTPase assay. The full-length p120 GAP expressed in insect Sf9 cells and the immunoaffinity purified full-length neurofibromin were used. Neurofibromin was readily inhibited by stearic and oleic acid, but p120 GAP was not inhibited even at high concentrations (<80 μM). Neurofibromin was also inhibited by low concentrations of all the polyunsaturated fatty acids tested (IC50 of 6 to 16 μM). p120 GAP was 2-3 fold less sensitive to inhibition by these fatty acids. The GTPase stimulatory activity of neurofibromin was also inhibited by arachidonic and oleic acid in the presence of a lipid mixture representing the major lipid components of the cell membrane. Chimeric proteins of neurofibromin and p120 GAP were used to determine that differential sensitivity to fatty acid inhibition maps to the catalytic domain of the proteins. These results indicated that fatty acids can modulate the GTPase function of the c-Ha-Ras protein by inhibiting the GTPase stimulatory activity of two Ras regulators, full-length neurofibromin and p120 GAP, at physiologically relevant concentrations in vitro.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, J. H., Harwalkar, J. A., Bryant, S. S., Sundaram, V., Jove, R., & Golubic, M. (2000). Inhibition of neurofibromin and p120 GTPase activating protein (GAP) by dietary fatty acids. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 469, 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4793-8_57

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free