Comparison of emergency department patient classification by point-of-care and central laboratory methods for cardiac troponin I

35Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome, we compared results of a rapid, point-of-care whole blood assay for cardiac troponin I (Abbott i-STAT, Abbott Point-of-Care, East Windsor, NJ) (Tn-P) with an automated central laboratory plasma assay (Siemens TnI-Ultra, Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY) (Tn-U). Clinical data were obtained during a 6-month period during which ED patients were screened by Tn-P, with retesting of elevated results by Tn-U. Of 5,909 Tn-P results, 573 (9.7%) were elevated; these and a random selection of 137 negative specimens were retested by Tn-U. Of the specimens with elevated results, 4.5% retested negative by Tn-U, even though Tn-U typically gave about 50% higher results and had a lower manufacturer-specified 99th percentile cutoff. Of the negatives, 5.8% retested as elevated by Tn-U, but with levels no higher than 0.1 ng/mL (0.1 μg/L). Rapid whole blood testing for cardiac troponin I gave generally reliable patient classifications compared with plasma testing in the central laboratory, but besides missing small elevations, produced some apparent false-positives. ©American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bock, J. L., Singer, A. J., & Thode, H. C. (2008). Comparison of emergency department patient classification by point-of-care and central laboratory methods for cardiac troponin I. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 130(1), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1309/NVXH8DL5HWFDNB74

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free