Gynaecological morbidities among ever married women: A community based study in Nanded city, India.

  • I.F I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Wo men's health has always remained neglected because of the traditional reductionist approach to women health research. A significant lacuna persists in understanding the factors influencing gynaecological morbidity as well as consequences for women's lives. Gynaecological diseases cover a range of conditions with a wide spectrum of lethality, chronicity and a substantial impact on women's quality of life. Objectives: To study the prevalence of gynaecological morbidities and its association with some socio demographic and reproductive factors among ever married women of reproductive age group Methodology: Study Design: Community based cross sectional descriptive study. Study Period: January 2011 to June 2012. Sampling Procedure: Probability proportionate sampling using 30 stage cluster sampling technique. Sample Size: 750 ever married women fro m 15-49 years age group Results: Prevalence of gynaecological morbidities was 568(75.73%). Mean gynaecological morbidities were 1.22. Majority 281(37.47%) study subjects had one gynaecological morbidity. Menstrual disorders 351(46.8%) was the most common gynaecological morbidity. There was a significant difference between the proportions of study subjects with gynaecological morbidities with respect to their age, educational status, age at menarche and duration marriage.Conclusions: There was high prevalence of gynaecological morbidities among study subjects with about 50% suffering from more than one gynaecological morbidities.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

I.F, I. (2013). Gynaecological morbidities among ever married women: A community based study in Nanded city, India. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 7(6), 05–11. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-0760511

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

84%

Researcher 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

67%

Social Sciences 4

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free