Reducing Risk as well as Inequality: Assessing the Welfare State's Insurance Effects

9Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Leading accounts of the politics of the welfare state focus on societal demands for risk-spreading policies. Yet current measures of the welfare state focus not on risk, but on inequality. To address this gap, this letter describes the development of two new measures, risk incidence and risk reduction, which correspond to the prevalence of large income losses and the degree to which welfare states reduce that prevalence, respectively. Unlike existing indicators, these measures require panel data, which the authors harmonize for twenty-one democracies. The study finds that large losses affect all income and education levels, making the welfare state valuable to a broad cross-section of citizens. It also finds that taxes and transfers greatly reduce the prevalence of such losses, though to varying degrees across countries and over time. Finally, it disaggregates the measures to identify specific 'triggers' of large losses, and finds that these triggers are associated with risks on which welfare states focus, such as unemployment and sickness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hacker, J. S., & Rehm, P. (2022). Reducing Risk as well as Inequality: Assessing the Welfare State’s Insurance Effects. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free