Systematic benchmarking of tools for CpG methylation detection from nanopore sequencing

78Citations
Citations of this article
263Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

DNA methylation plays a fundamental role in the control of gene expression and genome integrity. Although there are multiple tools that enable its detection from Nanopore sequencing, their accuracy remains largely unknown. Here, we present a systematic benchmarking of tools for the detection of CpG methylation from Nanopore sequencing using individual reads, control mixtures of methylated and unmethylated reads, and bisulfite sequencing. We found that tools have a tradeoff between false positives and false negatives and present a high dispersion with respect to the expected methylation frequency values. We described various strategies to improve the accuracy of these tools, including a consensus approach, METEORE (https://github.com/comprna/METEORE), based on the combination of the predictions from two or more tools that shows improved accuracy over individual tools. Snakemake pipelines are also provided for reproducibility and to enable the systematic application of our analyses to other datasets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yuen, Z. W. S., Srivastava, A., Daniel, R., McNevin, D., Jack, C., & Eyras, E. (2021). Systematic benchmarking of tools for CpG methylation detection from nanopore sequencing. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23778-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free