Is the validity of conscientiousness stable across time? Testing the role of trait bandwidth

3Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although research into issues of conscientiousness bandwidth for personnel selection has compared global vs. facet validities using cross-sectional designs, there has been an absence of longitudinal research. We provided the first empirical test of differential dynamicity between conscientiousness and its four facets across time, observing evidence suggesting dynamicity only for facets. Practitioner points: We evaluated global and facet conscientiousness validities across four annual criterion measurement occasions. Facet validities were more likely to change across time as compared to global conscientiousness validities. Global conscientiousness can be incorporated into selection systems if one's goal is to predict performance across time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harari, M. B., Naemi, B., & Viswesvaran, C. (2019). Is the validity of conscientiousness stable across time? Testing the role of trait bandwidth. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12241

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free