Alimentação hospitalar: Proposições para a qualificação do serviço de alimentação e nutrição, avaliadas pela comunidade científica

9Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The scope of this paper is to validate proposals used to qualify hospital food by the Brazilian scientific community. An electronic questionnaire was applied to clinical nutrition professionals registered on the Lattes Platform (Brazilian database of institutions and researchers' curricula in the areas of Science and Technology). The questionnaire incorporated a Likert scale and had spaces for comments. The themes dealt with patient participation, the nutritional and sensory quality of hospital diets, and planning and goals of the Hospital Food and Nutrition Service (HFNS). The questionnaire also asked for the top five priorities for a HFNS. Proposals with total or partial adherence equal to or greater than 70% were considered to be approved. All proposals had total adherence equal to or greater than 70%. The proposal that had minimal adherence (70%) was the one that proposed that nutritional intervention must be arranged by mutual agreement with the patient. The proposal that had maximal adherence (93%) was the one advocating that there must be statistical control on diets prescribed by the HFNS. The most cited priorities referred to infrastructure and training of human resources (40%), the quality of hospital food (27%) and the nutritional status of the patient.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diez-Garcia, R. W., Padilha, M., & Sanches, M. (2012). Alimentação hospitalar: Proposições para a qualificação do serviço de alimentação e nutrição, avaliadas pela comunidade científica. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 17(2), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000200020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free