Robots or agents-neither helps you more or less during second language acquisition experimental study on the effects of embodiment and type of speech output on evaluation and alignment

25Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When designing an artificial tutor, the question arises: should we opt for a virtual or a physical embodied conversational agent? With this work we contribute to the ongoing debate of whether, when and how virtual agents or robots provide more benefits to the user and conducted an experimental study on linguistic alignment processes in HCI in the context of second language acquisition. In our study (n = 130 non-native speakers) we explored the influence of design characteristics and investigated the influence of embodiment (virtual agent vs. robot vs. speech based interaction) and system voice (text-to-speech vs. prerecorded speech) on participants’ perception of the system, their motivation, their lexical and syntactical alignment during interaction and their learning effect after the interaction. The variation of system characteristics had no influence on the evaluation of the system or participants’ alignment behavior.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosenthal-Von Der Pütten, A. M., Straßmann, C., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Robots or agents-neither helps you more or less during second language acquisition experimental study on the effects of embodiment and type of speech output on evaluation and alignment. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10011 LNAI, pp. 256–268). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free