The masked demos: Associational anonymity and democratic practice

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The increased use of anonymous digital platforms raises substantive concerns about accountability in digital spaces. However, contemporary evaluations of anonymity focus too narrowly on its protective function: its ability to protect a diversity of speakers and ideas. Drawing on two examples of anonymous political engagements – Publius’s writing of the Federalist Papers and college students’ use of the social media platform Yik Yak – we develop an account of anonymity’s associational function: the processes by which people generate and negotiate collective identities, discussions, and actions in wider publics. As we argue, anonymity’s associational function can (1) generate conditions under which individuals develop collective interests and identities to foster collective action, and (2) enable novel interactions between these individuals and communities and the larger publics of which they are part. We conclude with a discussion of how attention to associational anonymity can contribute to a more nuanced account of democracy in practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forestal, J., & Philips, M. (2020). The masked demos: Associational anonymity and democratic practice. Contemporary Political Theory, 19(4), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00368-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free