Relative effectiveness of additive pain interventions during vaccination in infants

19Citations
Citations of this article
154Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaccine injections can cause acute pain and distress in infants, which can contribute to dissatisfaction with the vaccination experience and vaccine hesitancy. We sought to compare the effectiveness of additive pain interventions administered consistently during vaccine injections in the first year of life. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, longitudinal, double-blind, add-on, randomized controlled trial. Healthy infants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 levels of pain management for all vaccine injections at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months: (i) placebo control; (ii) parent-directed video education about infant soothing; (iii) the video plus sucrose administered orally or (iv) the video plus sucrose plus liposomal lidocaine applied topically. All infants benefit from injection techniques that minimize pain. We used a double-dummy design; hence all parents watched a video (active psychological intervention or placebo) and all infants received oral solution (sucrose or placebo) and topical cream (lidocaine or placebo). We assessed infant distress during 3 phases - preinjection (baseline), vaccine injection (needle), and 1 minute postinjection (recovery) - using the Modified Behavioural Pain Scale (range 0-10). We compared scores between groups and across infant ages using a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: A total of 352 infants participated in the study, from Jan. 17, 2012, to Feb. 2, 2016. Demographics did not differ among intervention groups (p > 0.05). Baseline pain scores did not differ among intervention groups (p = 0.4), but did differ across ages (p < 0.001). Needle pain scores differed among groups (p = 0.003) and across ages (p < 0.001). The mean (± standard deviation) needle score was 6.3 (± 0.8) in the video-sucrose-lidocaine group compared with 6.7 (± 0.8) in each of the other groups. There were no other between-group differences. Recovery scores did not differ among groups (p = 0.98), but did difder across ages (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Only liposomal lidocaine provided consistent analgesia within an additive pain intervention regimen during vaccinations in infants.

References Powered by Scopus

Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants

3579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Survey of the prevalence of immunization non-compliance due to needle fears in children and adults

364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inadequate pain management during routine childhood immunizations: The nerve of it

204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A hospital-wide initiative to eliminate or reduce needle pain in children using lean methodology

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taddio, A., Pillai, R. R., Ipp, M., Moss, S., Baker, S., Tolkin, J., … Stephens, D. (2017). Relative effectiveness of additive pain interventions during vaccination in infants. CMAJ, 189(6), E227–E234. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160542

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

66%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

16%

Researcher 8

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 27

39%

Medicine and Dentistry 27

39%

Psychology 14

20%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 25

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free