User participation in clinical decision-making in primary health care in chile

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. Describe users' experience with participation in clinical decision-making at Family Health Centers (CESFAM) in the Primary Health Care (PHC) system. Methods. Qualitative descriptive study. Focus groups made up of CESFAM users were held in southeastern Santiago, Chile, and the information was thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti version 6® software. Results. Five focus groups were held (n = 41). The main themes that emerged from the discussions were the passive role of users in decisions and delegated decision-making, based on their trust in the health professional. Users' passive role limits their opportunities for participation in clinical decision-making, ceding power to the health professional. However, establishing a therapeutic partnership allows users to feel that they are being treated as unique individuals whom the professional listens to and respects, ensuring that the decisions of the health team can be trusted, since they look out for the users' real interests. Conclusion. Users' participation in clinical encounters is still limited in Chile. However, bolstering that participation is essential for increasing user satisfaction and promoting people-centered care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bravo, P., Dois, A., Contreras, A., Soto, G., & Mora, I. (2018). User participation in clinical decision-making in primary health care in chile. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health, 42. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free