Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation

53Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prior single center or registry studies have shown that living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) decreases waitlist mortality and offers superior patient survival over deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study was to compare outcomes for adult LDLT and DDLT via systematic review. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine patient survival and graft survival, MELD, waiting time, technical complications, and postoperative infections. Out of 8600 abstracts, 19 international studies comparing adult LDLT and DDLT published between 1/2005 and 12/2017 were included. U.S. outcomes were analyzed using registry data. Overall, 4571 LDLT and 66,826 DDLT patients were examined. LDLT was associated with lower mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant (5-year HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.81–0.93], p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barbetta, A., Aljehani, M., Kim, M., Tien, C., Ahearn, A., Schilperoort, H., … Emamaullee, J. (2021). Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation, 21(7), 2399–2412. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16440

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free