Self-diagnosis of active head lice infestation by individuals from an impoverished community: High sensitivity and specificity

12Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To compare sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of self-diagnosis for head lice infestation with visual inspection, we conducted a study in an urban slum in Brazil. Individuals were asked about active head lice infestation (self-diagnosis); we performed visual inspection and thereafter wet combing (gold standard). Of the 175 individuals included, 77 (44%) had an active head lice infestation. For self-diagnosis, sensitivity (80.5%), specificity (91.8%), PPV (88.6%) and NPV (85.7%) were high. Sensitivity of visual inspection was 35.1%. Public health professionals can use selfdiagnosis as a diagnostic tool, to estimate accurately prevalence of pediculosis in a community, and to monitor ongoing intervention strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pilger, D., Khakban, A., Heukelbach, J., & Feldmeier, H. (2008). Self-diagnosis of active head lice infestation by individuals from an impoverished community: High sensitivity and specificity. Revista Do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 50(2), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652008000200011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free