Evaluation of whole-body retention of iodine-131 (131I) after postoperative remnant ablation for differentiated thyroid carcinoma - thyroxine withdrawal versus rhTSH administration: A retrospective comparison

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that preparation with recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) for thyroid remnant ablation results in lower extrathyroidal radiation compared to hypothyroidism. The results of 50radioiodine therapies (RITs) under rhTSH, regarding iodine half-life, were evaluated and compared with 50RITs performed on patients with hypothyroidism following thyroxine withdrawal. The patients were treated with 3700 MBq (100mCi) of 131I. Forty- hours after RIT, patients were measured with a radiation detector at a 1-meter (m) distance for evaluation of the effective dose (μSv/h). TSH and thyroglobulin (Tg) maximal values were also compared. rhTSH-stimulated patients had a significantly lower whole-body retention of 131I (8.5±7.3μSv/h), extrapolated from the measurements of the effective dose at a 1-m distance, compared to endogenously stimulated patients (13.6±8.1μSv/h; p=0.001). Furthermore, TSH mean and Tg median levels were significantly higher in the rhTSH-stimulated patients (89.9±15.3 mU/l and 7.7 ng/ml, respectively) compared to the hypothyroid group (59.2±25.1mU/l and 3.3 ng/ml; p<0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). Compared to thyroid hormone withdrawal, the use of rhTSH prior to RIT was associated with significantly lower whole-body retention of 131I and with greater efficacy in reaching TSH levels greater than 30 mU/l, confirming data previously described.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carvalho, M. R., Ferreira, T. C., & Leite, V. (2012). Evaluation of whole-body retention of iodine-131 (131I) after postoperative remnant ablation for differentiated thyroid carcinoma - thyroxine withdrawal versus rhTSH administration: A retrospective comparison. Oncology Letters, 3(3), 617–620. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.523

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free