Observational study of drug-drug interactions in oncological inpatients

11Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of potential clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in adult oncological inpatients, as well as to describe the most frequent interactions. A standard database was used. Method: An observational, transversal, and descriptive study including patients admitted to the Oncology Service of a reference hospital. All prescriptions were collected twice a week during a month. They were analysed using Lexicomp® database, recording all interactions classified with a level of risk: C, D or X. Results: A total of 1 850 drug-drug interactions were detected in 218 treatments. The prevalence of treatments with at least one clinically relevant interaction was 95%, being 94.5% for those at level C and 26.1% for levels D and X. The drugs most commonly involved in the interactions detected were opioid analgesics, antipsychotics (butyrophenones), benzodiazepines, pyrazolones, glucocorticoids and heparins, whereas interactions with antineoplastics were minimal, highlighting those related to paclitaxel and between metamizole and various antineoplastics. Conclusions: The prevalence of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions rate was very high, highlighting the high risk percentage of them related to level of risk X. Due to the frequency of onset and potential severity, highlighted the concomitant use of central nervous system depressants drugs with risk of respiratory depression, the risk of onset of anticholinergic symptoms when combining morphine or haloperidol with butylscopolamine, ipratropium bromide or dexchlorpheniramine and the multiple interactions involving metamizole.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Díaz-Carrasco, M. S., Almanchel-Rivadeneyra, M., Tomás-Luiz, A., Pelegrín-Montesinos, S., Ramírez-Roig, C., & Fernández-Ávila, J. J. (2018). Observational study of drug-drug interactions in oncological inpatients. Farmacia Hospitalaria, 42(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.7399/fh.10857

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free