The impact of the Coronial Communiqué on changing patient safety: A subscriber survey

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To determine whether the Coronial Communiqué prompted subscribers to initiate changes to clinical practice for patient safety an anonymous, online cross-sectional population survey questionnaire was provided to all registered subscribers to the Communiqué. The main outcome measure was selfreported review and change to practice. From 1325 subscribers invited to participate, 697 complete and valid responses were received (52.6%). Most of the respondents (588; 84.4%) reported the Communiqué provided ideas for improving patient safety, 429 (61.5%) reviewed their practice, and 290 (41.6%) changed their practice. The characteristic most associated with a change in practice was if the subscriber was in clinical practice. This association was evident for ideas (odds ratio [OR], 3.42; 95% CI, 2.24-5.23), review (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.91-3.61) and change to improve practice (OR, 2.40; 95% CI,1.73-3.32).

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text
1967Citations
628Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ibrahim, J. E., & Ehsani, J. P. (2009). The impact of the Coronial Communiqué on changing patient safety: A subscriber survey. Australian Health Review, 33(4), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH090583

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘16‘17‘2200.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Researcher 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0