Pregnancy among residents enrolled in general surgery (PREGS): A survey of residents in a single Canadian training program

32Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Interest in general surgery has declined, and lack of adequate accommodation for pregnancy and parenting may be a deterrent. We explored resident experiences with these issues within a single general surgery program. Methods:We surveyed residents enrolled in the University of British Columbia general surgery program from 1997 to 2009 using a Web-based survey tool. Information regarding demographics, pregnancy, postpartum issues and issues pertaining to maternity/parenting policies was obtained. We used the Student t test, Z test and Fisher exact test for statistical comparisons. Results: Of the 81 residents surveyed, 53 responded (65% response rate). There were fewer pregnancies during residency among female residents than among partners of male residents (PMRs; 9 pregnancies for 6 of 25 residents v. 23 pregnancies for 15 of 28 PMRs, p = 0.002). One of 9 pregnancies among female residents and 5 of 23 among PMRs ended in miscarriage (p > 0.99). Female residents and PMRs reported pregnancy-related complications with equal frequency. All female residents breastfed for at least 6 months; however, 67% (4 of 6) felt their resident role prevented them from breastfeeding as long as they would have liked. Most (5 of 6, 83%) pursued a graduate degree or research during their "maternity leave." More than 50% of residents reported that their own workload increased because of a colleague's pregnancy. Many (36 of 53, 68%) were unaware of the existence of any maternity/ parenting policy, and most were in favour of instituting such a policy. © 2011 Canadian Medical Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merchant, S., Hameed, G. M., & Melck, G. A. (2011). Pregnancy among residents enrolled in general surgery (PREGS): A survey of residents in a single Canadian training program. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 54(6), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.015710

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free