Does Emergence Also Belong to the Scientific Image? Elements of an Alternative Theoretical Framework Towards an Objective Notion of Emergence

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Emergence is a word that plays a central role in the natural or manifest image of the world, within which we organize our ordinary knowledge. Even though some interpretations of the “scientific image” leave no place for emergence, sciences increasingly made use of this word. But many philosophical arguments have been made against the consistence or validity of this concept. This chapter presents a computational view of emergence, alternative to the usual combinatorial view common among philosophers, that is formulated in terms of parts and wholes. It shows that computational emergence can be characterized in terms of causation, and that a subclass of computationally emergent processes displays many of the connotations of the scientific use of the term. After having so captured a concept of emergence, I turn to the question of applying the concept and testing whether some instantiations exist.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huneman, P. (2016). Does Emergence Also Belong to the Scientific Image? Elements of an Alternative Theoretical Framework Towards an Objective Notion of Emergence. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (Vol. 38, pp. 485–505). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26506-3_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free