The role of emotion in clinical decision making: An integrative literature review

157Citations
Citations of this article
485Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, clinical decision making has been perceived as a purely rational and cognitive process. Recently, a number of authors have linked emotional intelligence (EI) to clinical decision making (CDM) and calls have been made for an increased focus on EI skills for clinicians. The objective of this integrative literature review was to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence for a role of emotion in CDM. Methods: A systematic search of the bibliographic databases PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted to identify empirical studies of clinician populations. Search terms were focused to identify studies reporting clinician emotion OR clinician emotional intelligence OR emotional competence AND clinical decision making OR clinical reasoning. Results: Twenty three papers were retained for synthesis. These represented empirical work from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches and comprised work with a focus on experienced emotion and on skills associated with emotional intelligence. The studies examined nurses (10), physicians (7), occupational therapists (1), physiotherapists (1), mixed clinician samples (3), and unspecified infectious disease experts (1). We identified two main themes in the context of clinical decision making: the subjective experience of emotion; and, the application of emotion and cognition in CDM. Sub-themes under the subjective experience of emotion were: emotional response to contextual pressures; emotional responses to others; and, intentional exclusion of emotion from CDM. Under the application of emotion and cognition in CDM, sub-themes were: compassionate emotional labour - responsiveness to patient emotion within CDM; interdisciplinary tension regarding the significance and meaning of emotion in CDM; and, emotion and moral judgement. Conclusions: Clinicians' experienced emotions can and do affect clinical decision making, although acknowledgement of that is far from universal. Importantly, this occurs in the in the absence of a clear theoretical framework and educational preparation may not reflect the importance of emotional competence to effective CDM.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53020Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness

13293Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The integrative review: Updated methodology

5314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

What is good mental health? A scoping review

199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emotional intelligence buffers the effects of negative emotions on job burnout in nursing

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Self-efficacy and emotional intelligence as predictors of perceived stress in nursing professionals

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kozlowski, D., Hutchinson, M., Hurley, J., Rowley, J., & Sutherland, J. (2017). The role of emotion in clinical decision making: An integrative literature review. BMC Medical Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250306090120

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 141

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 27

13%

Researcher 23

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 21

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 103

46%

Medicine and Dentistry 72

32%

Psychology 34

15%

Social Sciences 13

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0