On the relation between expected returns and implied cost of capital

43Citations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examine the relation between implied cost of capital and expected returns under an assumption that expected returns are stochastic, a property supported by theory and empirical evidence. We demonstrate that implied cost of capital differs from expected return, on average, by a function encompassing volatilities of, as well as correlation between, expected returns and cash flows, growth in cash flows, and leverage. These results provide alternative explanations for findings from empirical studies employing implied cost of capital on the magnitude of the market risk premium; predictability of future returns; and the relations between cost of capital and a host of firm characteristics, such as growth, leverage, idiosyncratic risk and the firm's information environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hughes, J., Liu, J., & Liu, J. (2009). On the relation between expected returns and implied cost of capital. In Review of Accounting Studies (Vol. 14, pp. 246–259). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-009-9093-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free