The Netherlands: Populism versus Pillarization

  • Lucardie P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Until recent times, populism was not a significant political phenomenon in the Netherlands. That all changed in February 2002, when Pim Fortuyn founded a populist movement that became the country’s second largest parliamentary party just three months later. Following its leader’s violent death and its entry into coalition government, however, the Lijst Pim Fortuyn (LPF) rapidly disintegrated. This chapter will examine the swift and spectacular rise of Fortuyn’s movement in terms of (a) the structural conditions within which it emerged and (b) the agency of the LPF and its leader. In particular, the chapter aims to provide answers to the following questions: (1) can existing theories about the emergence of new parties explain the LPF’s sudden success? (2) how can we account for the equally rapid decline of the movement? (3) has Dutch populism disappeared or does it survive as a sleeping volcano that could erupt again at short notice?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lucardie, P. (2008). The Netherlands: Populism versus Pillarization. In Twenty-First Century Populism (pp. 151–165). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592100_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free