Effects of midline sagittal location on bone-conducted cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

11Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have investigated the effectiveness of two bone-conducted (BC) stimuli in producing vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) following stimulation along midsagittal skull sites. Twenty subjects (mean age 24 yr, range: 18-34 yr; 6 men; 14 women) were studied using a smoothed impulse and a 500-Hz tone burst applied to Nz, Fpz, AFz, Fz, FCz, and Cz with both compressive and rarefactive onset phases. Cervical (cVEMPs) and ocular VEMPs (oVEMPs) were recorded as well as linear acceleration in three axes. cVEMPs evoked by 500 Hz showed no change in response polarity to either stimulus location or phase. cVEMPs evoked by the impulsive stimulus showed larger initial peak amplitudes at AFz and Fz using compressive stimuli and differences in initial peak latency between the two phases. In contrast, amplitude, latency, and response polarity for oVEMPs were markedly affected by stimulus location and phase, which were similar for both BC stimuli, with little correlation with induced acceleration of the head. Latencies were earliest at AFz and Fz where compressive onset stimuli evoked an initial negativity (average latency 8.6-11.0 ms). At other sites compressive onset stimuli usually evoked oVEMPs with an initial positivity. We conclude that both 500 Hz and impulsive stimuli are effective means of evoking cVEMPs and oVEMPs from mid sagittal skull sites. The effects depend upon both location and phase and differ for oVEMPs and cVEMPs. Initial negativities for oVEMPs following compressive stimuli were most consistently obtained using the AFz and Fz sites.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Govender, S., & Colebatch, J. G. (2017). Effects of midline sagittal location on bone-conducted cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Journal of Applied Physiology, 122(6), 1470–1484. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01069.2016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free