Point-of-care lung ultrasound predicts in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure

12Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: B-lines have been associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) when found at hospital discharge or during outpatient visits. Whether lung ultrasound (LUS) assessed B-lines may predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute HF is still undetermined. Aim: To evaluate the association between B-lines on admission and in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with acute HF. Methods: Hand-held LUS was used to examine patients with acute HF. LUS was performed in eight chest zones with a pocket ultrasound device and analyzed offline. The association between B-lines and in-hospital mortality was assessed using Cox regression models. Results: We included 62 patients with median age 56 years, 69.4% men, and median left ventricle ejection fraction 25%. The sum of B-lines ranged from 0 to 53 (median 6.5). An optimal receiver operating characteristic-determined cut-off of ≥19 Blines demonstrated a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 86% (area under the curve 0.788) for in-hospital mortality. The incremental prognostic value of LUS when compared with lung crackles or peripheral edema by integrated discrimination improvement was 12.96% (95% CI: 7.0-18.8, P = 0.02). Patients with 19 B-lines had a 4-fold higher risk of in-hospital mortality (HR 4.38; 95% CI: 1.37-13.95, P < 0.01). Conclusion: In patients admitted with acute HF, point-of-care LUS measurements of pulmonary congestion (B-lines) are associated with in-hospital mortality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Araiza-Garaygordobil, D., Gopar-Nieto, R., Martínez-Amezcua, P., Cabello-López, A., Manzur-Sandoval, D., García-Cruz, E., … Arias-Mendoza, A. (2021). Point-of-care lung ultrasound predicts in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine , 114(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa298

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free