Endothelium-derived nitric oxide synthase protein expression in ovine placental arteries

22Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

During the third trimester, fetoplacental and uterine blood flows increase dramatically to meet the high metabolic demands of the growing fetus. We hypothesized that the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in fetoplacental artery endothelium and the concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) and cyclic GMP (cGMP) in amniotic fluid (AF) are increased during the third trimester of ovine gestation. Placental arteries and AF were collected from ewes at 110, 120, 130, and 142 days of gestation (n = 24; mean ± SEM term = 145 ± 3 days). Expression of eNOS protein was measured in intact and denuded placental arteries and in endothelium-derived protein by Western analysis and confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Concentrations of NO (nitrates plus nitrites) and cGMP were determined in AF. Placental artery eNOS protein expression was localized to the endothelium, where it was markedly greater than in vascular smooth muscle. Placental artery endothelium-derived eNOS expression and AF cGMP concentrations were similar at 110 and 120 days of gestation; however, both peaked at 130 days at levels two- to threefold above baseline (P < 0.05) before returning to baseline at 142 days of pregnancy. The AF NO (nitrates plus nitrites) levels, however, increased progressively between 120 days of gestation and term (P < 0.05). We concluded that endothelium-derived placental artery eNOS levels, AF NO (nitrates plus nitrites), and AF cGMP were markedly increased during the third trimester, thus supporting a role for NO-mediated elevations in cGMP in the control of fetoplacental blood flow.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheppard, C., Shaw, C. E., Li, Y., Bird, I. M., & Magness, R. R. (2001). Endothelium-derived nitric oxide synthase protein expression in ovine placental arteries. Biology of Reproduction, 64(5), 1494–1499. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.5.1494

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free