A comparison between constitutive and inducible transgenic expression of the PhRIP I gene for broad-spectrum resistance against phytopathogens in potato

12Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To engineer broad spectrum resistance in potato using different expression strategies. Results: The previously identified Ribosome-Inactivating Protein from Phytolacca heterotepala was expressed in potato under a constitutive or a wound-inducible promoter. Leaves and tubers of the plants constitutively expressing the transgene were resistant to Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia solani, respectively. The wound-inducible promoter was useful in driving the expression upon wounding and fungal damage, and conferred resistance to B. cinerea. The observed differences between the expression strategies are discussed considering the benefits and features offered by the two systems. Conclusions: Evidence is provided of the possible impact of promoter sequences to engineer BSR in plants, highlighting that the selection of a suitable expression strategy has to balance specific needs and target species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gonzales-Salazar, R., Cecere, B., Ruocco, M., Rao, R., & Corrado, G. (2017). A comparison between constitutive and inducible transgenic expression of the PhRIP I gene for broad-spectrum resistance against phytopathogens in potato. Biotechnology Letters, 39(7), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-017-2335-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free