Comparison of classification methods for P300 brain-computer interface on disabled subjects

92Citations
Citations of this article
164Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We report on tests with a mind typing paradigm based on a P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) on a group of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke, and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients, suffering from motor and speech disabilities. We investigate the achieved typing accuracy given the individual patient's disorder, and how it correlates with the type of classifier used. We considered 7 types of classifiers, linear as well as nonlinear ones, and found that, overall, one type of linear classifier yielded a higher classification accuracy. In addition to the selection of the classifier, we also suggest and discuss a number of recommendations to be considered when building a P300-based typing system for disabled subjects. © 2011 Nikolay V. Manyakov et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manyakov, N. V., Chumerin, N., Combaz, A., & Van Hulle, M. M. (2011). Comparison of classification methods for P300 brain-computer interface on disabled subjects. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/519868

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free