Laser scanning versus wide‐field—choosing the appropriate microscope in life sciences

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methods and applications of light microscopy in the life sciences are compared with re-spect to 3D imaging, resolution, light exposure, sensitivity, and recording time. While conventional wide‐field or laser scanning microscopy appear appropriate for smaller samples of only a few mi-crometers in size with a limited number of light exposures, light sheet microscopy appears to be an optimal method for larger 3D cell cultures, biopsies, or small organisms if multiple exposures or long measuring periods are desired. Super‐resolution techniques should be considered in the con-text of high light exposure possibly causing photobleaching and photo‐toxicity to living specimens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schneckenburger, H., & Richter, V. (2021, January 2). Laser scanning versus wide‐field—choosing the appropriate microscope in life sciences. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020733

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free