Efficiency and usability of a near field communication-enabled tablet for medication administration

12Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Barcode-based technology coupled with the electronic medication administration record (e-MAR) reduces medication errors and potential adverse drug events (ADEs). However, many current barcode-enabled medication administration (BCMA) systems are difficult to maneuver and often require multiple barcode scans. We developed a prototype, next generation near field communication-enabled medication administration (NFCMA) system using a tablet. Objective: We compared the efficiency and usability of the prototype NFCMA system with the traditional BCMA system. Methods: We used a mixed-methods design using a randomized observational cross-over study, a survey, and one-on-one interviews to compare the prototype NFCMA system with a traditional BCMA system. The study took place at an academic medical simulation center. Twenty nurses with BCMA experience participated in two simulated patient medication administration scenarios: one using the BCMA system, and the other using the prototype NFCMA system. We collected overall scenario completion time and number of medication scanning attempts per scenario, and compared those using paired t tests. We also collected participant feedback on the prototype NFCMA system using the modified International Business Machines (IBM) Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and a semistructured interview. We performed descriptive statistics on participant characteristics and responses to the IBM PSSUQ. Interview data was analyzed using content analysis with a qualitative description approach to review and categorize feedback from participants. Results: Mean total time to complete the scenarios using the NFCMA and the BCMA systems was 202 seconds and 182 seconds, respectively (P=.09). Mean scan attempts with the NFCMA was 7.6 attempts compared with 6.5 attempts with the BCMA system (P=.12). In the usability survey, 95% (19/20) of participants agreed that the prototype NFCMA system was easy to use and easy to learn, with a pleasant interface. Participants expressed interest in using the NFCMA tablet in the hospital; suggestions focused on implementation issues, such as storage of the mobile devices and infection control methods. Conclusions: The NFCMA system had similar efficiency to the BCMA system in a simulated scenario. The prototype NFCMA system was well received by nurses and offers promise to improve nurse medication administration efficiency.

References Powered by Scopus

Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description?

8515Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention

2884Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use

1700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Rotterdam prostate cancer risk calculator: Development and usability testing of the mobile phone app

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Testing usability and acceptability of a web application to promote physical activity (iCanFit) among older adults

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Usability and User Experience of Cognitive Intervention Technologies for Elderly People With MCI or Dementia: A Systematic Review

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Landman, A., Neri, P. M., Robertson, A., McEvoy, D., Dinsmore, M., Sweet, M., … Miles, S. (2014). Efficiency and usability of a near field communication-enabled tablet for medication administration. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3215

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

64%

Researcher 9

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 19

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

30%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

14%

Computer Science 5

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free