Measurement training and feedback system for implementation of evidence-based treatment for adolescent externalizing problems: Protocol for a randomized trial of pragmatic clinician training

8Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Innovations in clinical training and support that enhance fidelity to evidence-based treatment (EBT) for adolescent behavior problems are sorely needed. This study will develop an online training system to address this gap: Measurement Training and Feedback System for Implementation (MTFS-I). Using procedures intended to be practical and sustainable, MTFS-I is designed to increase two aspects of therapist behavior that are fundamental to boosting EBT fidelity: therapist self-monitoring of EBT delivery, and therapist utilization of core techniques of EBTs in treatment sessions. This version of MTFS-I focuses on two empirically supported treatment approaches for adolescent conduct and substance use problems: family therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Methods/design: MTFS-I expands on conventional measurement feedback systems for client outcomes by adding training in observational coding to promote EBT self-monitoring and focusing on implementation of EBT treatment techniques. It has two primary components. (1) The training component, delivered weekly in two connected parts, involves self-monitored learning modules containing brief clinical descriptions of core EBT techniques and mock session coding exercises based on 5-8 min video segments that illustrate delivery of core techniques. (2) The feedback component summarizes aggregated therapist-reported data on EBT techniques used with their active caseloads. MTFS-I is hosted online and requires approximately 20 min per week to complete for each treatment approach. This randomized trial will first collect data on existing delivery of family therapy and CBT techniques for youth in outpatient behavioral health sites (Baseline phase). It will then randomize site clinicians to two study conditions (Implementation phase): Training Only versus Training + Feedback + Consultation. Therapists will choose whether to train in family therapy, CBT, or both. Study aims will compare clinician performance across study phase and between study conditions on MTFS-I uptake, reliability and accuracy in EBT self-monitoring, and utilization of EBT techniques in treatment sessions (based on observer coding of audiotapes). Discussion: Study contributions to implementation science and considerations of MTFS-I sustainability are discussed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03722654. Registered on 29 October 2018.

References Powered by Scopus

Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability

19030Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Training therapists in evidence-based practice: A critical review of studies from a systems-contextual perspective

856Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping Evidence-Based Treatments for Children and Adolescents: Application of the Distillation and Matching Model to 615 Treatments From 322 Randomized Trials

527Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Core Elements of CBT for Adolescent Conduct and Substance Use Problems: Comorbidity, Clinical Techniques, and Case Examples

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community Implementation of MI-Enhanced Behavior Therapy for Adolescent ADHD: Linking Fidelity to Effectiveness

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Online Training of Community Therapists in Observational Coding of Family Therapy Techniques: Reliability and Accuracy

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hogue, A., Bobek, M., MacLean, A., Porter, N., Jensen-Doss, A., & Henderson, C. E. (2019). Measurement training and feedback system for implementation of evidence-based treatment for adolescent externalizing problems: Protocol for a randomized trial of pragmatic clinician training. Trials, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3783-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

50%

Researcher 8

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 15

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

17%

Neuroscience 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free