Overview of surfactant replacement trials

87Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Clinical trials have evaluated the overall efficacy of surfactant therapy, as well as the relative efficacy of different surfactant preparations, the optimal timing of administration and the optimal dosage. Surfactant therapy leads to significant clinical improvement in infants at risk for, or having, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Clinical trials that compared the effects of synthetic or animal-derived surfactant preparations to placebo or no therapy demonstrate that surfactant therapy lead to rapid improvement in oxygenation, decreased ventilator support, decreased risk of pneumothorax, and mortality. Earlier treatment, prophylactic treatment of infants at high risk of developing RDS, and selective re-treatment leads to improved clinical outcome as well. Currently available animal-derived surfactants are superior to non-protein-containing synthetic surfactants. Ongoing evaluation will determine if important differences in animal-derived products are noted. Future trials will evaluate third-generation surfactant products and further refine what constitutes optimal use of surfactant. © 2004 Nature Publishing Group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soll, R. F. (2005). Overview of surfactant replacement trials. Journal of Perinatology, 25, S40–S44. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free