Recognition of facial features in immediate memory

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study sought to determine which facial features are best retained in a recognition test of immediate memory. Following a 30-sec viewing of an entire face in either a front or profile orientation, subjects were tested for feature recognition of the eyes, nose, or mouth in either the same or different orientation. Results showed (1) performance was significantly above chance in each condition, (2) feature selection was superior when study and test orientations were the same, (3) there were differences among the individual features when the study and test orientations were the same, but no differences when the orientations differed, and (4) when the study and test orientations were the same, the eyes and mouth were recognized better than the nose. These data provide converging evidence on the relative importance of the eyes and mouth for facial recognition. © 1978, The Psychonmic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Levels of processing: A framework for memory research

6547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory

279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

When face recognition fails

223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Transfer between views of conspecific faces at different ages or in different orientations by sheep

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Facial feature variation: Anthropometric data II

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How monkeys see others: Discrimination and recognition of monkeys' shape

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seamon, J. G., Stolz, J. A., Bass, D. H., & Chatinover, A. I. (1978). Recognition of facial features in immediate memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12(3), 231–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329680

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 2

40%

Psychology 2

40%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free