Reproductive health care appointments: How the institutional organization of obstetric/gynecological work shapes the experiences of women with female genital cutting in Toronto, Canada

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigated the social relations shaping the reproductive health care experiences of women with female genital cutting (FGC) in Toronto, Canada. Using Institutional Ethnography, we interviewed eight women with FGC and seven obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/ GYN). We found a disjuncture between women’s needs during appointments that extended beyond the reproductive body and range of care that doctors were able to provide. Women engaged in emotional healthwork during appointments by explaining FGC to doctors, reading doctors’ body language, and getting through vulvar/vaginal examinations. Women reported that if they had emotional reactions during appointments, they were often referred to a mental health specialist, a referral on which they did not act. OB/GYNs described their specialty as “surgical”-training centered around treating reproductive abnormalities and not mental health issues. Therefore, the disjuncture between women’s needs and OB/ GYNs’ institutional training highlights the difficulties inherent when bodies of “difference” encounter the reproductive health care system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jacobson, D., Grace, D., Boddy, J., & Einstein, G. (2023). Reproductive health care appointments: How the institutional organization of obstetric/gynecological work shapes the experiences of women with female genital cutting in Toronto, Canada. PLoS ONE, 18(1 January). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279867

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free