Public scholarship and CSCW: Trials and twitterations

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

From tweeting, to blogging, to engagement with the media, scholars in CSCW engage in a variety of forms of public scholarship. Public scholarship can result in positive outcomes, such as community engagement, accessible research, and self-promotion. Further, public scholarship can support ethical research as a way to (1) reconnect with participants after data collection; and (2) increase the societal benefit of the research. However, despite these benefits there are also challenges and risks associated with engaging in public scholarship, particularly for early career researchers and those who are marginalized. This workshop will bring together those who already engage or are interested in this practice to discuss how to integrate public scholarship in our work, identify best practices for this type of work in the context of CSCW, including the ethical implications of outreach, and develop strategies to effectively support those most affected by the potential risks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilbert, S. A., Fiesler, C., Blackwell, L., Devito, M. A., Dye, M., Goddard, S., … Smith, C. E. (2020). Public scholarship and CSCW: Trials and twitterations. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (pp. 447–456). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418589

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free