Good deal hedging and valuation under combined uncertainty about drift and volatility

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study robust notions of good-deal hedging and valuation under combined uncertainty about the drifts and volatilities of asset prices. Good-deal bounds are determined by a subset of risk-neutral pricing measures such that not only opportunities for arbitrage are excluded but also deals that are too good, by restricting instantaneous Sharpe ratios. A non-dominated multiple priors approach to model uncertainty (ambiguity) leads to worst-case good-deal bounds. Corresponding hedging strategies arise as minimizers of a suitable coherent risk measure. Good-deal bounds and hedges for measurable claims are characterized by solutions to secondorder backward stochastic differential equations whose generators are non-convex in the volatility. These hedging strategies are robust with respect to uncertainty in the sense that their tracking errors satisfy a supermartingale property under all a-priori valuation measures, uniformly over all priors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becherer, D., & Kentia, K. (2017). Good deal hedging and valuation under combined uncertainty about drift and volatility. Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41546-017-0024-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free