The Intentional Versus the Propositional Structure of Contents

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper argues that the objects of belief should not be conceived as sets of possible worlds or propositions of set of centered possible worlds or egocentric propositions (this is the propositional conception), but rather as sets of pairs consisting of a centered world and a sequence of objects (this is the intentional conception of the objects of belief). The paper explains the deep significance of this thesis for the framework of two-dimensional semantics, indeed for any framework trying to adequately relate semantics and epistemology (which is here construed as what I call the Congruence Principle). I give three arguments for this thesis, two preliminary indecisive ones by way of examples, and third theoretical one alluding to a deep principle of philosophical psychology (which I call the Invariance Principle). This paper is an improved and up-dated version of my paper No. 25. It will appear in Causation, Coherence, and Concepts. A Collection of Essays of mine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

The Intentional Versus the Propositional Structure of Contents. (2008). In Causation, Coherence, and Concepts (pp. 335–359). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5474-7_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free