Prior work on videoconferencing shows that various design changes can have profound impacts on group dynamics. In order to further explore the available design space, we report on a qualitative study that compares behaviour of groups in two group-to-group videoconferencing environments and face-to-face communication during a complex social dilemma game. There are pronounced differences in participant behaviour between the two videoconferencing designs, indicating higher cooperative behaviour in one of the videoconferencing conditions. Based on qualitative analysis of the gameplay, we hypothesise that the decisive factor is a discrepancy in the type of group identity that develops during the game. Our results suggest that the differences in behaviour are due to differences in design of the two videoconferencing environments. In particular, the incorporation of personal displays and individualised videostreams likely contributed to these outcomes. © Springer-Verlag London 2012.
CITATION STYLE
Slovák, P., Novák, P., Troubil, P., Rusňák, V., Holub, P., & Hofer, E. C. (2012). Exploring collaboration in group-to-group videoconferencing. In From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems: Results and Open Challenges - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, COOP 2012 (pp. 229–244). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4093-1_16
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.