Supertasks, Physics and the Axiom of Infinity

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It seems reasonable to assume that mathematical infinity was not the objective of Zeno’s dichotomy (in any of its variants); however, some kind of mathematical infinity was already at stake in his celebrated arguments. Aristotle proposed a solution to Zeno’s dichotomy by introducing what we now call one-to-one correspondences, the key instrument of modern infinitist mathematics. But Aristotle, more a naturalist than a platonist, finally rejected the method of pairing the elements of two infinite collections (in the case at hand, points and instants) and introduced instead the distinction between actual and potential infinities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

León-Sánchez, A., & C. León-Mejía, A. (2016). Supertasks, Physics and the Axiom of Infinity. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (Vol. 28, pp. 223–259). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45980-6_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free