Cardiac anisotropy in boundary-element models for the electrocardiogram

80Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The boundary-element method (BEM) is widely used for electrocardiogram (ECG) simulation. Its major disadvantage is its perceived inability to deal with the anisotropic electric conductivity of the myocardial interstitium, which led researchers to represent only intracellular anisotropy or neglect anisotropy altogether. We computed ECGs with a BEM model based on dipole sources that accounted for a "compound" anisotropy ratio. The ECGs were compared with those computed by a finite-difference model, in which intracellular and interstitial anisotropy could be represented without compromise. For a given set of conductivities, we always found a compound anisotropy value that led to acceptable differences between BEM and finite-difference results. In contrast, a fully isotropic model produced unacceptably large differences. A model that accounted only for intracellular anisotropy showed intermediate performance. We conclude that using a compound anisotropy ratio allows BEM-based ECG models to more accurately represent both anisotropies. © The Author(s) 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Potse, M., Dubé, B., & Vinet, A. (2009). Cardiac anisotropy in boundary-element models for the electrocardiogram. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 47(7), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0472-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free