Evaluation of the epistemic uncertainty in fragility analysis depending on the ground motion dataset and intensity measure

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The main components of fragility analysis of structures can be listed as compilation of ground motion dataset, structural analysis and selection of ground motion intensity measures. In this study, epistemic uncertainty with respect to the selection of the ground motion dataset and intensity measure is evaluated. In this respect, the fragility curves of building type structural simulations for four different ground motion dataset and three selected intensity measures are developed by considering two different approaches and possible variations are investigated. The detailed evaluations which depend on the fragility curves and the deterministic earthquake scenarios indicate that the compiled ground motion datasets, selected intensity measures and fragility curve development approaches can considerably affect the analysis results. However, it can be concluded that the most influential parameter on the analysis results is intensity measure and its effective selection can considerably decrease the epistemic uncertainty in fragility analysis.

References Powered by Scopus

Incremental dynamic analysis

3993Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines

2108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis

1251Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kale, Ö. (2019). Evaluation of the epistemic uncertainty in fragility analysis depending on the ground motion dataset and intensity measure. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 34(4), 2125–2140. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.424054

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free