Epistemic modality and projection in argumentative writing: A corpus-driven comparison of chinese english majors and native english speakers

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In academic writings, writers are supposed to properly express the degree of certainty and doubt. Especially in the argumentative text, writers are required to give appropriate arguments and project previous theories or ideas. Epistemic modality and projection are concerned with how writers express their degree of certainty and doubt, which is important for a qualified argumentative text writer. Through comparison of 30 pieces of argumentative essays respectively from Chinese English majors and native English speakers of undergraduate level, this study finds that Chinese English majors rely more on a narrower and imbalanced epistemic devices and projecting verbs in their writings. Therefore, it’s imperative for Chinese English majors to expand their vocabulary and improve their English proficiency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, D., & Zeng, X. (2021). Epistemic modality and projection in argumentative writing: A corpus-driven comparison of chinese english majors and native english speakers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(4), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1104.11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free