Differential diagnosis in atypical facial pain: A clinical study

31Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objetive: To evaluate a sample of patients with atypical facial pain (AFP) in comparison to patients with symptomatic facial pain (SFP). Method: 41 patients with previous diagnostic of AFP were submitted to a standardized evaluation protocol, by a multidisciplinary pain team. Results: 21 (51.2%) were considered AFP and 20 (48.8%) (SFP) received the following diagnosis: 8 (40.0%) had temporomandibular disorders (TMD); 3 (15.0%) had TMD associated to systemic disease (fibromyalgia, systemic erythematosus lupus); 4 (20.0%) had neuropathy after ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery for petroclival tumor; 2 (10.0%) had Wallenberg syndrome; 1 (5.0%) had intracranial tumor; 1 (5.0%) had oral cancer (epidermoid carcinoma), and 1 (5.0%) had burning mouth syndrome (BMS) associated to fibromyalgia. Spontaneous descriptors of pain were not different between AFP and SFP groups (p=0.82). Allodynia was frequent in SFP (p=0.05) and emotion was the triggering factor most prevalent in AFP (p=0.06). AFP patients had more traumatic events previously to pain (p=0.001). Conclusion: AFP patients had more: a) traumatic events previously to pain onset, and b) emotions as a triggering factor for pain. These data support the need of trained health professionals in multidisciplinary groups for the accurate diagnosis and treatment of these patients.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine: The Basis of Diagnosis and Treatment: Third Edition

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nóbrega, J. C. M., De Siqueira, S. R. D. T., De Siqueira, J. T. T., & Teixeira, M. J. (2007). Differential diagnosis in atypical facial pain: A clinical study. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 65(2 A), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2007000200013

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

67%

Researcher 10

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 43

83%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

10%

Chemistry 2

4%

Neuroscience 2

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0