Comparing aberration detection methods with stimulated data

103Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We compared aberration detection methods requiring historical data to those that require little background by using simulated data. Methods that require less historical data are as sensitive and specific as those that require 3-5 years of data. These simulations can determine which method produces appropriate sensitivity and specificity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutwagner, L., Browne, T., Seeman, G. M., & Fleischauer, A. T. (2005). Comparing aberration detection methods with stimulated data. Emerging Infectious Diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1102.040587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free