Abstract
We compared aberration detection methods requiring historical data to those that require little background by using simulated data. Methods that require less historical data are as sensitive and specific as those that require 3-5 years of data. These simulations can determine which method produces appropriate sensitivity and specificity.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Hutwagner, L., Browne, T., Seeman, G. M., & Fleischauer, A. T. (2005). Comparing aberration detection methods with stimulated data. Emerging Infectious Diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1102.040587
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free